W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2008

[Bug 6201] Constraints on particles (3.9.6)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:16:01 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1L4dAP-0007SY-IB@farnsworth.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6201


David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |David_E3@VERIFONE.com
           Keywords|                            |editorial




--- Comment #1 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>  2008-11-24 15:16:01 ---
Telcon 2008-11-21

This is a specific instance of a general problem, the use of
"constraint"  
to
describe various definitions of terms.  There is a general sense in the
WG that recasting this in general might be a good thing for definitions,
modulo caution about accidentally affecting the impact of the
conformance section.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 24 November 2008 15:16:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:16 GMT