W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2008

[Bug 6234] New: Set or Sequence

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:57:01 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-6234-703@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6234

           Summary: Set or Sequence
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1 only
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org


There are schema component properties whose values are "a set of ...
components". Given that we need to provide SCDs for these components, do we
need to replace "set" with "sequence"?

In particular, {identity-constraint definitions} and {substitution group
affiliations} on Element Declarations; {attribute uses} on Complex Type
Definitions and Attribute Group Definitions; and {facets} on Simple Type
Definitions.

I believe this was the reason why we use "sequence" instead of "set" in some
other places (e.g. "a sequence of annotations").


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 15:57:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:16 GMT