W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2008

[Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:29:57 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1KwLET-0001xk-Qf@farnsworth.w3.org>


--- Comment #7 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>  2008-11-01 18:29:57 ---
>The work of dynamic consistency checking of type assignments with the types which would be assigned to potential siblings is done in clause 5 of the validation rule Element Locally Valid (Complex Type).

Thanks. I've now sussed out how that works. Mind-blowing, I need a very strong
drink to recover. That leaves the question: is there an equivalent rule in XSD
1.0 that would make the content 


invalid against this content model, or have we introduced an incompatibility?

(And the secondary question, if it was allowed in 1.0, and no-one complained,
then who benefits from the introduction of this amazingly complex machinery
designed to make it invalid in 1.1?)

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2008 18:30:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:08 UTC