http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5293 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Keywords|needsReview |resolved Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #11 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2008-05-23 23:23 ------- At its telcon today, the XML Schema WG considered the wording proposal mentioned in comment #10. As noted, it contains two ways of resolving the issue: adding a rule forbidding derivation of all groups from sequences and from any but simple choices, or specifying that run-time checking of the relevant constraint is allowed when all-groups are involved. The WG chose the run-time checking, and instructed the editors to add a statement that whether a processor finds the relevant errors statically in all cases, dynamically in all cases, or sometimes one and sometimes the other, is implementation-defined. (The exact boundary, when sometimes such errors are found statically and sometimes only dynamically, however, is implementation-dependent.) The proposal has been integrated into the status-quo text with the desired amendment, so I am marking this issue resolved. Michael, as the originator, please indicate etc. etc. You know what to do and you know how to do it.Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 23:23:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 23 May 2008 23:23:49 GMT