http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5263 ------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com 2007-11-12 10:46 ------- Furthermore, in the definition of altType, the definition of the id attribute should be removed, because it is a duplicate (it is already present in the type being extended). (Actually, the spec is open to interpretation here. The set of attribute uses is formed as a union of the attribute uses defined on the base type and the extended type, and the concept of union depends on the concept of component identity which is not clearly defined. If the two attribute uses are considered to be identical, then the union contains only one copy, so there is no error. But the validity of the S4SD shouldn't depend on this interpretation.)Received on Monday, 12 November 2007 10:46:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:12 GMT