W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2007

[Bug 3228] Lists|Unions of Lists|Unions

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:23:45 +0000
CC:
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1IYDZp-00013F-0t@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3228





------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2007-09-20 04:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=489)
 --> (http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=489&action=view)
Wording proposal of 19 September 2007

A wording proposal is attached, which adds a note after the definition
of list, describing the constraint on item types, and a similar
note after the definition of union, describing what may and what
must not be a member type of a union.

The wording proposal also contains a change to the description of
the simple type definition component, allowing unions with
empty sequences of member types; strictly speaking this change is not
directly related to the issue raised here (it is a change we
agreed to make when we adopted the current definition of xs:error),
but while preparing this wording proposal I happened to notice
that we had not made the necessary correction yet, so I took the
opportunity to do it now.

N.B. this wording proposal has NOT had the benefit of review by the
other editors.
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 04:23:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:06 UTC