[Bug 4881] Should -NaN be allowed and given a meaning?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4881





------- Comment #2 from davep@iit.edu  2007-08-07 02:41 -------
(In reply to comment #1)

> allowed.  If we wish to cover the case of the sign bit of NaNs in out lexical
> representations, 
s/in out/in our/

Sorry.  :-(

Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 02:41:16 UTC