W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2007

[Bug 4881] Should -NaN be allowed and given a meaning?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 02:41:14 +0000
CC:
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1IIF0U-0005qh-W9@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4881





------- Comment #2 from davep@iit.edu  2007-08-07 02:41 -------
(In reply to comment #1)

> allowed.  If we wish to cover the case of the sign bit of NaNs in out lexical
> representations, 
s/in out/in our/

Sorry.  :-(
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 02:41:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:06 UTC