http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3817 ------- Comment #4 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-03-19 23:52 ------- For the record, the reason the editors did not propose, and WG did not consider, adding a keyword like schemaLocationHintsIgnored with the semantics described in comment # 3 is that the proposition "this process ignores schema location hints in the instance" is already expressible with the existing vocabulary defined in appendix D (specifically, as noted in comment #1, in appendix D.2.1).Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 23:52:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:41 GMT