[Bug 3970] Assertions: Wording of the actual draft

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3970


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|                            |editorial




------- Comment #1 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2007-02-24 02:28 -------
Some of the items described in this issue report are addressed 
in the wording proposals adopted at today's WG call; some are 
addressed in the pending wording proposal at 
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.treetrimming.200702.html
(W3C member-only link).

Specifically, the WG has agreed to allow arbitrary XPath expressions in 
assertions.  Processors are not required to support all of XPath,
only the defined subset, so expressions outside the defined subset will
only be supported by processors which support more than the subset.
But schema authors can legally write such expressions.  Also, a
[failed assertions] property is now defined. 

The remaining items on this list appear to me to be editorial, so 
I am adding the keyword 'editorial' to this issue and propose to try
to address the concerns regarding clarity and nuance in editorial
proposals, later.

Received on Saturday, 24 February 2007 02:28:52 UTC