http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4602 ------- Comment #1 from davep@iit.edu 2007-06-07 15:04 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > In part 2 of both 1.0 and 1.1, NOTATION type has the following constraint: > > "Schema Component Constraint: enumeration facet value required for NOTATION > It is an ˇerrorˇ for NOTATION to be used directly in a schema. Only datatypes > that are derived from NOTATION by specifying a value for ˇenumerationˇ can be > used in a schema." > > But it's not clear what "used directly in a schema" means. It's always been my understanding that it means that NOTATION can only be the base type of a datatype immediately derived as an enumeration. That's possibly more restrictive than is really necessary, and it doesn't answer the case of xsi:type--since that's in the instance, not the schema.Received on Thursday, 7 June 2007 15:09:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:41 GMT