http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 ht@inf.ed.ac.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | ------- Comment #2 from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk 2007-04-02 08:49 ------- "As shown, schema document is not valid because it lacks an import. "The specification is not ambiguous about this." I don't agree. The spec says, wrt this namespace, "All schema processors have appropriate attribute declarations for these attributes built in". We certainly do _not_ require an import for the other namespace which is built-in, namely the Schema namespace itself. The spec. as written actually _does_ appear to require an import for http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema, in that clause 4.2 of "Schema Representation Constraint: QName resolution (Schema Document)" does not explicitly provide for any exceptions. So until we clarify that _only_ the Schema namespace itself is special in this regard, I think the spec. _is_ ambiguous, and should be fixed.Received on Monday, 2 April 2007 08:49:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:11 GMT