W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2006

[Bug 3850] Two definitions of "constraining facet(s)"

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:06:15 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1GaNIV-00043O-Tw@wiggum.w3.org>


           Summary: Two definitions of "constraining facet(s)"
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1 only
          Platform: Macintosh
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: davep@iit.edu
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org

In section 4.3 there is a definition of "constraining facets" (plural) and a
separate definition of "constraining facet" (singular).  We shouldn't do this
unless the plural is indeed meant to mean something different from more than
one of the singular.  In this case, the plural definition really tells what a
constraining facet is, and the singular simply adds that all constraining
facets are defined in the spec; no others may be added by users.

Suggest we delete the second definition and either add the fact that all are
defined in 4.3 to the plural definition or add it as an additional
non-definition sentence.
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 02:06:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:05 UTC