W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 1838] RQ-152: Should XML Schema 1.1 be aligned with XML 1.1?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:06:07 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1F2uSd-0007y0-W2@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1838


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|needsDrafting               |resolved
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org  2006-01-28 18:06 -------
On 27 January 2006 the WG adopted a proposal to make it
implementation-defined whether schema software supports
the XML- and Namespaces-dependent types using the definitions
of NCName, Char, etc. found in 1.0 of those specifications,
or the definitions found in 1.1, or both.  Similarly,
when schema validity assessors read XML as input (as
opposed to DOM trees or some other representation of the
infoset, where version information may be unavailable),
support for 1.0, 1.1, or both is implementation defined.

In the case of the datatypes, it is recommended that 
the choice of which flavor of the datatypes to use should be 
under user control.  In the case of XML input, it is
said only that the choice may be under user control.

The WG also agreed that we should augment the PSVI to
show which version of the relevant types was used; that
will be tracked in another issue.
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2006 18:07:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:04 UTC