W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 2737] wd-5: Editorial comments

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:59:37 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1F03M9-0005vB-IL@wiggum.w3.org>


           Summary: wd-5: Editorial comments
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1 only
          Platform: PC
               URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: needsDrafting
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: holstege@mathling.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org

I don't see the value of pointing out that equality is a congruence relation. 
The only other occurrence of "congruence" is in the appendices that define it.

I don't see what the first occurrence of "on the other hand" is referring to as 
the first hand.

as in the Order section, we should define the '=' notation before using it 
instead of the other way around.

I think you explained it, but I still find confusing, "there is one equality 
relation for all values of all datatypes"

raised on 7 Apr 2004 by Xan Gregg (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-
agreed on 19 Nov 2004 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/

Assign to editors to fix
Acknowledgment cycle
Not started
Action history
Part 2 Editors
accepted on 19 Nov 2004 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/

Editors to attempt to resolve wd-5 in the next working draft
Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 20:59:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:04 UTC