W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2006

[Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:06:15 +0000
CC:
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FdP6d-0007ce-5b@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3232

           Summary: Type versus Datatype
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1 only
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org


QT approved comment:

In 2.6.1.2, the second paragraph is an example of a residual use of the
word "type" rather than "datatype". This also occurs in constructs such as
"base type" and "item type". It's not clear whether the spec is trying to
make a distinction between the two words. "Union type" and "union datatype"
are used apparently interchangeably.
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:06:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:39 GMT