W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2006

[Bug 3221] Terminology: "value"

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:33:33 +0000
CC:
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1FdOaz-0000wP-Qb@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3221

           Summary: Terminology: "value"
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1 only
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org


QT-approved comment.

Section 2.1. It is worth noting that the word "value" has different
meanings in Schema and in QT. This gives QT some terminology problems: a QT
atomic value is a pair comprising an SV and a type, where an SV is a "value"
as defined in XML Schema; but QT has no name for the concept, having used
"value" for something else. This sometimes leads to circumlocutions such as "a
point in the value space". A more distinctive term, such as "datapoint",
might be worth considering.
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 09:33:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:39 GMT