http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2433 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org 2005-12-28 01:21 ------- As near as I can tell from the opaque description of this issue, it was intended to be used to track the decision to recast the description of the {primitive type definition} mapping in Datatypes 4.1.2. The wording agreed on in Edinburgh was "If the corresponding datatype is ·special· or ·primitive·, then as specified in Built-in Simple Type Definitions (§4.1.6), otherwise, among the ancestors of this STD, that STD which corresponds to a primitive datatype." This wording was integrated into the status quo document on 8 December 2005, so I'm marking this resolved.Received on Wednesday, 28 December 2005 01:21:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:39 GMT