- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 23:32:57 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2616 ------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org 2005-12-22 23:32 ------- The phrase " the ·actual value· of the targetNamespace [attribute] of the parent <schema> element information item, or ·absent· if there is none" also appears unnecessarily complex. If there is no targetNamespace attribute, its value is absent, is it not? And if so, then we can safely say simply "the ·actual value· of the targetNamespace [attribute] of the ancestor <schema> element information item" for this part of the mapping rule.
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2005 23:33:01 UTC