W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2005

unique constraint interpretation.

From: Tishkin, Eugene <etishkin@mackenziefinancial.com>
Date: 05 Dec 2005 16:04:11 -0700
Message-ID: <9685B8A36EB4A344A2AD0CC3508262C8B8B911@MFMAILEVS1.mackenziefinancial.bz>
To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>

Hi,

The below is the comment from Xerces parser BUG 18405 report:
================================================
"3 For each node in the
Ětarget node setĚ
all of the
{fields},
with that node as the context node, evaluate to either an empty node-set or a
node-set with exactly one member, which must have a simple type."

The target node set is the set of nodes on which the selector is matched.  Note
that this condition must hold for *any* identity constraint; only in bullet 4
of the tableau are the differences between key and unique described. 
Therefore, it seems clear that, if a selector matches, then either all of the
fields must match or none of them must match; even for xsd:unique, you can't
have some fields matching.
=========================================================

Especially I'm interested in the conclusion:

"Therefore, it seems clear that, if a selector matches, then either all of the
fields must match or none of them must match; even for xsd:unique, you can't
have some fields matching."

Is this a correct interpretation of unique constraint?

Regards,
Eugene





This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information. Any
distributing, copying or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail by anyone other
than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail
accidentally, please delete it and notify the sender. Although this message has been
screened for viruses, we cannot guarantee that our virus scanner will detect all
viruses and take no responsibility for any damage or loss that may be caused by its
contents.
Received on Monday, 5 December 2005 23:06:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:10 GMT