W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 2080] R-090: Questions about the lexical and canonical rep'ns of dateTime

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:05:09 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Ebjdd-0000q7-CG@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Additional Comments From davep@iit.edu  2005-11-14 19:05 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> There is a conformance note in 2E for duration, but the same note didn't exist 
> for other related types.

The note exists, in one uniform place (App C under current numbering), and is
referenced in each appropriate date/time datatype.

> Also note the same wording appears in 1.1 part 2 (in an appendix) and we don't 
> know where it should below.

s/below/go/ ?

An appropriate location for all such notes will be provided by the EP currently
being considered by the editors to specify appropriate behavior of "partial
implementations" and to unify the handling of such notes.
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 19:05:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:04 UTC