W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 2408] Consistency need wrt "forbidden" and "must be absent"

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:47:25 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1ET03B-0003Ge-HK@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2408

           Summary: Consistency need wrt "forbidden" and "must be absent"
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XSD Part 2: Datatypes
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org


In the published 1.1 datatypes draft

http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.html

{primitive type definition} ..., otherwise forbidden.
{item type definition} ..., otherwise forbidden.
{member type definitions} ..., otherwise must be absent.

I think they should be consistent and all say "must be absent".

This also applies to {referenced key} for identity constraints in part 1.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2005 16:47:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:09 GMT