W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 2317] Clarify ID/IDREF rules for unions and lists

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:29:05 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1EKcvh-0006CB-J7@wiggum.w3.org>


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
           Keywords|                            |unclassified

------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org  2005-09-28 14:29 -------
I think (speaking for myself) that the right way to solve this problem is
to develop, within the Working Group and within the spec, a clearer and
cleaner way of talking about the types (plural) of values and the 
type (singular? or types plural?) of an element or attribute. 

Ultimately, what we want to say is that atomic values of type ID and
IDREF go into the relevant tables.  We don't currently have a good
way of saying it in any simple form.
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 14:31:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:04 UTC