- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:20:05 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2219
Summary: R-227: identity constraints and xsi:nil
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSD Part 1: Structures
AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
If an element selected by the field of an identity constraint has
xsi:nil='true', is the value treated as missing? For example, is the following
instance valid, given the schema.
schema
------
<xml version="1.0"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xsd:element name="root">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element ref="uid" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:unique id="foo123" name="uuid">
<xsd:selector xpath=".//uid"/>
<xsd:field xpath="."/>
</xsd:unique>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="uid" nillable="true" type="xsd:anySimpleType"/>
</xsd:schema>
instance
--------
<xml version="1.0"?>
<root xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="idF018.xsd">
<uid xsi:nil="true" xsi:type="xsd:string"/>
<uid xsi:nil="true"/>
</root>
I think this should be valid since the xsi:nil attribute on the uid elements
would be equivalent to the elements missing for the purposes of identity
constraints. Either way 3.11.4 of Schema part 1 could use some clarification
around xsi:nil.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003JulSep/0024.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 19:20:17 UTC