W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 2142] R-151: Questions about equal fundamental facet

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:40:23 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EErLz-0004up-HN@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2142


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-12 16:40 -------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0060.html

Resolution:
Discussed at the May 31 telecon. The WG divided the question into: 

R-151a: can types derived from the same primitive type, but not derived from 
each other, can have equal values? 
R-151b(i): should we make an explicit statement that the primitive value spaces 
are disjoint? 
R-151b(ii): should we add a note to the descriptions of base64Binary and 
hexBinary saying explicitly that their value spaces are disjoint? 

RESOLVED unanimously: to classify R-151a (on whether types derived from the 
same primitive type, but not derived from each other, can have equal values) as 
a clarification with erratum, and instruct the editors to draft an erratum 
saying yes they can.

RESOLVED: to classify R-151b(i) as a clarification with erratum and instruct 
the editors to draft an erratum saying explicitly that the primitive value 
spaces are disjoint. 

On R-151b(ii) we considered a proposal to class it a clarification with erratum 
and to instruct the editors to draft an appropriate clarification. The proposal 
failed. 

Proposed text may be found at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Jun/0061.html 

Brief discussion of the text began at the June 20 telecon, but no detailed 
review of the text was done. 

Final revised text
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Sep/0057.html
approved at Sept. 13 concall.

Erratum E2-46 added.
Received on Monday, 12 September 2005 16:40:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:09 GMT