W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 2112] R-123: A question about redefining redefines

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:14:10 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1EDkZu-000743-De@wiggum.w3.org>


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME

------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-09 15:14 -------
Henry's response: 

Unfortunately the term 'top-level' is not formally defined in the REC. There 
are a number of places where things such as "all the top-level (i.e. named) 
components. . ." appear, so it's clear that what's meant is (XML 
representations of) named components which appear in one of the sets of 
definitions/declarations of the schema component itself. On that basis, redefs 
of redefs are OK, and were certainly intended to be. An erratum is in order, in 
my opinion.


Discussed and resolved at the June 12, 2003 telecon: 
RESOLVED: to classify R-123 as clarification without erratum. 
ACTION: Sandy Gao to send Mark Feblowitz a copy of SG's note explaining the 
logic of our decision.
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 15:14:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:04 UTC