[Bug 2112] R-123: A question about redefining redefines

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2112


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME




------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-09 15:14 -------
Henry's response: 

Unfortunately the term 'top-level' is not formally defined in the REC. There 
are a number of places where things such as "all the top-level (i.e. named) 
components. . ." appear, so it's clear that what's meant is (XML 
representations of) named components which appear in one of the sets of 
definitions/declarations of the schema component itself. On that basis, redefs 
of redefs are OK, and were certainly intended to be. An erratum is in order, in 
my opinion.

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002JanMar/0513.html

Resolution:
Discussed and resolved at the June 12, 2003 telecon: 
RESOLVED: to classify R-123 as clarification without erratum. 
ACTION: Sandy Gao to send Mark Feblowitz a copy of SG's note explaining the 
logic of our decision.

Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 15:14:17 UTC