- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:12:50 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2111 ------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2005-09-09 15:12 ------- Martin Gudgin: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2002Feb/0037.html Henry Thompson: Yes. The REC is underspecified in the area of the order of the implicit choice represented by a substitution group head. I think an erratum is in order, as Martin Gudgin suggested, clarifying that in this case the order constraint doesn't apply. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002JanMar/0512.html Resolution: Resolved at the May f2f. Editor is instructed to draft a minimalist erratum that fixes the problem.
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 15:13:08 UTC