W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 2080] R-090: Questions about the lexical and canonical rep'ns of dateTime

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:16:46 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1EDZNe-0004ls-Gq@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-09 03:16 -------
Ashok's response:

The WG agreed that the minimum number of digits needs to be specified. 
The WG agreed that a canonical form needs to be chosen for "24:00:00" for the 
various types. 
Proposed errata text for the 2 issues: 



Text discussed at the Feb. 7 concall:

Further discussion of the decisions to be made for the text launched on the ig 
list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Feb/0046.html 

Further discussion at the Apr. 11 telecon: 

The only remaining issue to be resolved is item 5 from list of questions.

Status 06/28: Discussed at length at the June 14, 20 and 28 concalls. No 
consensus was reached. Latest discussion and summary of open issues can be 
found at:

Discussed and resolved at the July f2f

Paul Biron to produce errata text.

Discussed again at the Oct. 25 telecon. WG resolved that the minimum number of 
digits to be supported is 3.

Ashok drafted some text - see:

Part of the proposed text, i.e. the conformance note, was approved at the May 
23,2003 telecon. Additional text, describing behaviour when a processor 
receives more digits than it supports is still pending approval.
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 03:16:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:03 UTC