W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 2070] R-080: Meaning of ##other

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:00:38 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1EDZ82-000496-JU@wiggum.w3.org>


           Summary: R-080: Meaning of ##other
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.0
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XSD Part 1: Structures
        AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
        ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org

There is contradictory definition of the meaning of ##other in the Rec Draft of 
XML Schema. One section indicates that any attribute/element from any namespace 
other than the target namespace is valid, including absent namespace. Another 
section specifies that a valid attribute/element must be namespace qualified. 
So is the absent namespace valid or not?

Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 03:00:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:03 UTC