W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 2068] R-078: Issue to do with definition of substitution groups, block, and UPA

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:59:12 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EDZ6e-00044e-4m@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2068


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-09 02:59 -------
See the discussion from the 01/03/2002 telecon: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Jan/0006.html 

Further discussion at the 01/24/2002 telecon: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Jan/0082.html 

Resolution:
The WG resolved to classify R-78 as an error, and instruct the editor to draft 
an erratum, defining substitution group not recursively as now but using a 
formulation similar to that of 3.3.6 Substitution Group OK (Transitive), while 
not changing other constraints (such as the requirement that the data types of 
the two elements stand in a particular derivation relation). See: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Jan/0101.html 

Proposed text:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0175.html
reviewed at Oct. 11 telecon. Approved with suggested ammendments (see meeting 
minutes for details). 

Erratum E1-23 added
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 03:00:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:09 GMT