W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 2065] R-076: Question about content type EMPTY

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:55:15 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EDZ2p-0003ty-GD@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2065


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME




------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-09 02:55 -------
The WG decided (at the 01/03/2002 telecon) that the commentator interpreted the 
rules correctly and they were in fact intended. Also, it should be noted, that 
there are different validation semantics for elements of type "foo" and "bar".
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 02:55:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:09 GMT