- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 03:07:04 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2039
Summary: value constraints with type ENTITY/ENTITIES
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSD Part 1: Structures
AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
When a value constraint is specified on an element/attribute declaration, it's
required for the canonical lexical representation to be "string valid" with
respect to the type. When the type is or is derived from ENTITY or
ENTITIES, "string valid" requires that entity values need to be "declared
entity name"s. 2 questions:
- Should we enforce "entity" constraints when checking value constraint values?
(I tend to think the answer should be "No".)
- Assume the answer to the above question is yes, then do the values need to be
entity names declared in the schema document?
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 03:07:10 UTC