W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 1919] RQ-150c: specify minimum implementation limits for precisionDecimal

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:27:31 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1ED8OB-0002jN-A3@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1919


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|cmsmcq@w3.org               |w3c-xml-schema-wg@w3.org




------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org  2005-09-07 22:27 -------
A separate proposal to resolve this issue is available at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b1919.20050831.html

It raises the design question: what should the implementation
minima for precision decimal be?  Should they correspond to
decimal32? decimal64? decimal128?  (or perhaps the uninvented
decimal16?)
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2005 22:27:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:09 GMT