W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2005

[Bug 1969] New: Does Part 2 need a summary constraint making the component tableaux normative?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:56:49 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EBbJx-0003pZ-I2@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1969

           Summary: Does Part 2 need a summary constraint making the
                    component tableaux normative?
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.0
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XSD Part 2: Datatypes
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org


Part 1 has a Schema Component Constraint for every component, the first clause 
of all of which effectively says "The value constraints in the component 
tableau above are normative".  We don't have anything like that for the Facet 
components of Part 2.  Should we add a single SCC somewhere which enforces this 
for all Facet component tableaux?

I've labelled this "1.0", since strictly speaking this is a bug/weakness in 1.0 
and could be handled as a Clarification with Erratum
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2005 16:56:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:09 GMT