Re: It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...

"Post, Dr. Ulrich" <Ulrich.Post@softwareag.com> writes:

>>> I think the type definition 
>>>
>>>   <xs:complexType base="xs:anyType" name="empty" />
>>>
>>> should be rejected
>
>> What makes you think it is _not_ rejected?
> Nothing - but there was a preceeding contribution indicating that!
> See
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2005JanMar/0011.html

Ah, sorry, I missed that earlier post.  I'll reply to it on the
substance.

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]