Re: It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...

"Post, Dr. Ulrich" <Ulrich.Post@softwareag.com> writes:

> I think the type definition 
>
>   <xs:complexType base="xs:anyType" name="empty" />
>
> should be rejected

What makes you think it is _not_ rejected?

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]