>Doesn't sound useful enough to force the backward >incompatability with 1.0. Changing the mapping from largest/smallest value to Infinity is a similar change, is not it? >This is much like the situation with comparing dateTime values, one with >a timezone and one without. Not sure it is a similar situation. There is no silent mapping and no loss of information in this case. Oh, well. I guess those who care about large numbers will just find a way to bypass this schema limitation. Daniel;Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 22:35:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:36 GMT