Re: Canonical representation of QName/NOTATION values

Sorry for the confusion. I'm aware of that issue against 1.0. My comment 
is actually against 1.1 draft, and I should've made that clear.

Thanks,
Sandy Gao
Software Developer, IBM Canada
(1-905) 413-3255
sandygao@ca.ibm.com




Xan Gregg <xan.gregg@jmp.com> 
12/11/2004 03:10 PM

To
www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
cc
Sandy Gao/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Subject
Re: Canonical representation of QName/NOTATION values






This is R-98, classified as an Error with the resolution "In Progress".

http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments#pfiCanonQName