W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2004

Canonical representation of QName/NOTATION values

From: Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 12:36:58 -0500
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF58661D80.CC14BB22-ON85256F64.00606978-85256F64.0060B429@ca.ibm.com>
The lexical representation of a QName/NOTATION value has the form 
"prefix:localpart" (or "localpart"), and the value of a QName is a tuple 
{namespace, localpart}. Then what's the canonical representation of a 
QName/NOTATION value? How is the prefix (if any) picked? How is it 
guaranteed that the prefix is always bound to the desired namespace?

Sandy Gao
Software Developer, IBM Canada
(1-905) 413-3255
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2004 17:37:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:02 UTC