W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: qnames and chameleon include

From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:09:55 -0700
Message-Id: <8E9F0028F5955844899380433C60E39902A0D380@cscrdemsg001.crdc.kp.org>
To: "'www-xml-schema-comments'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Biron,Paul V 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:59 PM
> To: www-xml-schema-comments
> Subject: qnames and chameleon include
> 
> Not wanting to walk too far down the "solution" path
> before fully understanding the problem to be solved,
> I can see at least 2 ways to fix this (maybe we need
> both, neither or something else completely, I'll leave
> that up the WG): 1) amend 3.2 of [1] to cover not only
> the absent *target* namespace but also the default
> namespace; 2) amend [2] and/or [3] (Qname resolution
> and/or interpretation) to somehow cover this case.

I should have added: I think I'd prefer a simple Note: this means that.... kind of note be added somewhere detailing what should happen in this case.

pvb
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2004 21:13:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:42 UTC