It appears that the definition of the {facets} property of the simple type definition schema component includes both the fundamental and constraining facets, according to the definition. OTOH, since the description talks about a possibly empty set of facets and there is also a {fundamental facets} property which is the set of fundamental facets, I suspect it was intended that the {facets} property only include constraining facets. -- Dave Peterson SGMLWorks! davep@iit.eduReceived on Monday, 20 September 2004 02:59:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:35 GMT