W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Comments on the Charter of the XML Schema Working Group

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 19:31:55 +0800
Message-ID: <2A2B2F12CF99EA4A898E2D4729441B41D781E1@exwa2-per.wa.csiro.au>
To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Cc: <w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org>

John Hockaday wrote:

"There needs to be some sort of PUBLIC identifier and Oasis Catalogue
system within the XML Schema specification so that one can identify on
his or her system where the validators can find the local copies of the
XML Schemas and so that one doesn't have to edit his or her XML Schemas
and XML Document Instances to find the location of the relative XML

It is not clear that this is an issue related to the XML Schema
specification. It is made quite clear in the XML Schema specification
that the values of both xsi:schemaLocation and xsd:schemaLocation
attributes should be treated as "hints"
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#composition-schemaImport) for
precisely the reasons described - it is legal for a processor to prefer
a different source for descriptions of the components. So in fact it is
a processor configuration issue. And most XML Schema processors *do*
provide at least some support for OASIS Catalog - in the case of XML Spy
this is quite limited, but it is there so the tool may be configured. 

However, I believe that the issue is really the "processing model" for
which there is or was another W3C working group. See
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/03/13/processing-model.html and

Simon.Cox@csiro.au  CSIRO Exploration & Mining
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151
PO Box 1130, Bentley WA 6102  AUSTRALIA
T: +61(8) 6436 8639  F: +61(8) 6436 8555  
C: +61(4) 0330 2672 callto://dr_shorthair 
Received on Sunday, 5 September 2004 11:32:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:02 UTC