Re: final resolutions of 2e comments (was Re: are regex quantifiers ambiguous?)

On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 19:17, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote:
> Thanks for the comment.
> 
> The error you point out (yes, it's certainly an error)
> is in the Rec Comments list as R-41; no erratum for it
> has been drafted, and I regret to inform you that the
> Working Group is unwilling to delay 2E to add one more
> correction, particularly since implementers have not
> reported trouble detecting the problem and doing the 
> right thing. 
> 
> It *is* on the list and it *will* get fixed.  But there
> are only so many things we can do at a time.  I hope
> you can understand.

I can understand.  I'm not happy about it, but
I understand.

-CMSMcQ