- From: Daniel Barclay <daniel@fgm.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:20:35 -0400
- To: Daniel Barclay <daniel@fgm.com>
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
I wrote:
> Regarding the draft at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PER-xmlschema-1-20040318/:
>
> Section 4.2.1 says:
>
> ... all the components of all the ·XML Schemas· corresponding
> to any <include>d schema documents.
>
> AGH!!!
>
> The notation "<include>" has meant "include element." Using it
> as a verb (or punctuation the verb "include" as an element name)
^ punctuating
> is confusing, or at least jarring.
Especially consider the density of occurrences of that form in
the next sentence:
Such included schema documents must either (a) have the same
targetNamespace as the <include>ing schema document, or (b) no
targetNamespace at all, in which case the <include>d schema
document is converted to the <include>ing schema document's
targetNamespace.
> Just say "corresponding to any included schema documents"
... as already done at the beginning of that second sentence.
Daniel
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2004 14:21:05 UTC