XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.1 editorial

Regarding the draft at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PER-xmlschema-1-20040318/:


Section 4.1 says:

   ... (note not a ·schema document·) ...

(not the possible parse like "ask not what your country can do
for you") instead of saying:

   ... (note: not a ·schema document·) ...



A sentence begins:

   ·assessment· is defined with reference to ...

Could such occurrences use standard capitalization?  (Would
any automated linking or human interpretation of dot-highlighted
terms break?)



Daniel