W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2004

XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.1 editorial

From: Daniel Barclay <daniel@fgm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:02:11 -0400
Message-ID: <40D08B23.5070507@fgm.com>
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org

Regarding the draft at

Section 4.1 says:

   ... (note not a ·schema document·) ...

(not the possible parse like "ask not what your country can do
for you") instead of saying:

   ... (note: not a ·schema document·) ...

A sentence begins:

   ·assessment· is defined with reference to ...

Could such occurrences use standard capitalization?  (Would
any automated linking or human interpretation of dot-highlighted
terms break?)

Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2004 14:02:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:02 UTC