Regarding the draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PER-xmlschema-1-20040318/: Section 3.4.1 says: {attribute uses} are a set of attribute uses. ... {attribute wildcard}s provide a more flexible specification for ... These examples exemplify the problem with the form used to refer to properties. The first sounds like it's trying to say "attribute uses are sets of attribute uses." If it clearly said "the {attribute uses} property is a set of attribute uses" it would be much...um... well...clearer. The second can't decide whether it's talking about attribute wildcards or the attribute wildcard property (or is it talking about multiple wildcard properties (across multiple complex type definition components)?). The specification would probably be significantly clearer if the wording were more explicit. DanielReceived on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 15:41:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:33 GMT