W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: [ht@inf.ed.ac.uk: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free]

From: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:29:23 -0400
To: Mike Cowlishaw <MFC@uk.ibm.com>
Cc: Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040415182923.GB27521@skunk.reutershealth.com>

Mike Cowlishaw scripsit:

> For background, see my paper "Decimal Floating-Point: Algorism for 
> Computers", available at:
> 
>    http://www2.hursley.ibm.com/decimal/IEEE-cowlishaw-arith16.pdf

I just read it this morning, thanks.  If you're okay with it, I'm okay with it.
But I still think that arbitrary interval types are a Good Thing to have.

-- 
Said Agatha Christie / To E. Philips Oppenheim  John Cowan
"Who is this Hemingway? / Who is this Proust?   jcowan@reutershealth.com
Who is this Vladimir / Whatchamacallum,         http://www.reutershealth.com
This neopostrealist / Rabble?" she groused.     http://www.ccil.org/cowan
        --author unknown to me; any suggestions?
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 14:34:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:15:34 UTC