Re: Annotation allowed on XML representation of attribute use (Possible erratum? )

In the 2003-07-05 call, we discussed lost annotations. Here was the
decision:

"We noted that RQ-130 is already about lost annotations.  We can (a)
add these cases to RQ-130 or (b) put them into a separate requirement.
We agreed on the former.

RESOLVED: integrate the cases of lost annotations mentioned in R-163
(and any other cases we find of lost annotations) into RQ-130."

But it seems that RQ-130 wasn't updated for such decision.

Thanks,
Sandy Gao
Software Developer, IBM Canada
(1-905) 413-3255
sandygao@ca.ibm.com



                                                                                                                                
                      noah_mendelsohn@u                                                                                         
                      s.ibm.com                To:       ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk                                                     
                                               cc:       fallside@us.ibm.com, dknguyen@us.ibm.com, Lisa                         
                      10/07/2003 09:03          Martin/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, Sandy Gao/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA,                          
                      AM                        www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org                                                  
                                               Subject:  Re: Annotation allowed on XML representation of attribute use          
                                                (Possible erratum? )                                                            
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                



(For uninteresting reasons due to my mail setup, some of you will receive
extra copies of this.  My apologies.)

Henry Thompson writes:

>> I think in principle this is covered by RQ-19,
>> RQ-130 and RQ-131 [1]. In practice it's of
>> course useful to tabulate the tricky cases, such
>> as particles.

Sounds right on both counts.  We had some internal queries regarding the
Rec. and I confess I had forgotten that we had related issues I should
have tracked down.  I do agree that we should make sure all cases
including particles are clearly covered.  Is there draft text floating
around anywhere?   Thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------