RE: Fixed element value w/ simple type

Perhaps it should say "complex type with simple content".  Would that do
it?

All the best, Ashok

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandy Gao [mailto:sandygao@ca.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:18 PM
> To: Ashok Malhotra
> Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Fixed element value w/ simple type
> 
> > 5.2.2.2.2 applies to the complex type of the element in question.
> 
> Right. But I'm concerned with the case where the element has a simple
type
> and a fixed value constraint. There is no constraint for this case.
> 5.2.2.2
> only deals with cases where the element has a complex type.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sandy Gao
> Software Developer, IBM Canada
> (1-905) 413-3255
> sandygao@ca.ibm.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                       "Ashok Malhotra"
>                       <ashokma@microsof        To:       Sandy
> Gao/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
>                       t.com>                   cc:
>                                                Subject:  RE: Fixed
element
> value w/ simple type
>                       07/11/2003 06:12
>                       PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sandy:
> I think it's OK.  Could be worded better, perhaps.
> 
> 5.2.2.2.2 applies to the complex type of the element in question.
> 
> All the best, Ashok
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-xml-schema-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:www-xml-schema-
> > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sandy Gao
> > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:28 AM
> > To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: Fixed element value w/ simple type
> >
> >
> > Maybe I'm misreading the spec, but it's not clear from the spec what
> to do
> > in this case. Bullet 5.2.2.2 of constraint [1] deals with default
> element
> > value. 5.2.2.2.1 talks about complex type with mixed content, and
> > 5.2.2.2.2
> > talks about complex type with simple type content. So there is no
rule
> for
> > elements with simple types.
> >
> > Maybe 5.2.2.2.2 should be changed to say if the actual type is a
> simple
> > type or if it's a complex type with simple type content?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sandy Gao
> > Software Developer, IBM Canada
> > (1-905) 413-3255
> > sandygao@ca.ibm.com
> >
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 18:23:00 UTC