References, [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0222.html (member only) [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-ref-20030109/#issue_mg_dups [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-ref-20030109/#issue_ag_dups Mary and I bumped into this issue. Today, there is no mechanism to trace back the origin of some of the components that were assembled via compiling an attribute/model group. <quote> (4) Unrolled named model and attribute groups Model groups and attribute groups get unrolled at the point of use in a way that leaves no trace in the component model. The same schema components therefore recur in the graph in undetectable ways. Given that the named model and attribute groups exist in their own right as schema components, this is at least inconsistent with how, say, type or attribute declarations function and complicates rules for eliminating duplicate SCDs. </quote> For details, please refer to [1], [2] and [3]. Regards, AsirReceived on Thursday, 23 January 2003 14:38:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:13:31 GMT