The description of the predicate in steps for simple types says that the predicate is: If {variety} is union and the [name] is empty, the pair {position, n} where n is the position of the simple type definition among {member type definitions} but I think the text needs to distinguish between the {variety} of the simple type being selected in the step and that of its parent, if any. A top-level simple type which happens to be a union does not need a numeric predicate; its name will sufficiently identify it. It is only an anonymous simple type defined within a union that needs a number. Or am I wrong? -CMSMcQReceived on Friday, 27 December 2002 08:05:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:01 GMT